Essay on American Government and Politics Part 1
The restriction of the hate speech is the issue worth considering since hate speeches may be as dangerous as hate crimes, but, if hate speech are delivered to the large audience, they may be even more dangerous than hate crimes. Therefore, hate speeches should be banned because they wreak havoc in society, give rise to radical ideas and movements and encourage hate crimes.
At this point, it is possible to refer to the recent case of Philadelphia gay bashing, which evoked numerous negative and hate speeches openly published online as well as in other media. In fact, making hate speech leads to the radicalization of the audience and, as Butler justly remarks, hate speech makes the situation even worse since the public response to the hate crime evokes not just a negative public response and condemnation but creates condition for new hate crimes.
At the same time, hate speech against representatives of some ethnic groups are offensive and unacceptable as was the case of Costella in New Hampshire, who made hate speech against two employees of Wal-Mart (JTA, 2014). Such hate speeches are manifestations of disrespect to basic rights of people and their discrimination on the ground of their ethnic or racial background. Hate speeches are also provocative since employees offended by Costella could have responded in the violent way, if their psychological condition and response were different.
Thus, hate speech should be banned because it contributes to the radicalization of society, emergence of hatred and growing tension in relations between people. Unlike a hate crime, hate speech can reach the broad audience and cause riots and other issues.
Government and Politics Part 2
Do you like this essay?
Our writers can write a paper like this for you!
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...