From the Classicists to the Impressionists essay
The development of the modern art raises quite a controversial response in the public because the public cannot always perceive experiments of artists properly and just misunderstands works of art. In this respect, the ability of artists to catch the audience’s attention and to create comprehensive and attractive works of art are particularly important in terms of the development of new works of art attractive and comprehensible for the audience. At this point, it is possible to refer to the Art Now! Course and Christine Swintak, who reveals her vision of the modern art and works of artist. The author suggest making art closer to people and the mass audience making daring experiments, when conventional, routine objects and items are transformed by artists in true works of art.
At this point, the author’s position is reasonable, especially, when she draws a large number of works art, when conventional products are transformed by artists, like a banal rollercoaster made in the head office of an energy drink company. The modern art has evolved consistently and artists tend to experiments. Daring experiments proposed by Christine Swintak are effective because they make the audience rethinking conventional objects and items and transforming them into works of art. Due to such work of artists, they can make the audience thinking of art and view art in simple things, which surround them in their regular life. In such a way, artists reach their target customer group and communicate with the audience by means of their works.
Furthermore, today, the audience needs the help from the part of the artist to understand art better. In this regard, the poor communication of artists with their audience emerges because of their underperformance and failure to catch the public attention and create works of art that are attractive and interesting for the audience. In addition, the artist should create works of art that are close to the audience. In this regard, the use of conventional objects as Swintak suggests can be really helpful because the audience learns to find art in routine objects. Moreover, such experiments in the field of art help artists to reach their audience and increase the interest of the public to art. Therefore, art becomes the means of communication between the artist and the audience.
At the same time, experiments should convey specific messages and ideas, which the artist attempts to convey to the audience. In this regard, the development of comprehensible forms of art may lead to the simplification of art. Hence, the problem emerges. Artists may slip to the simplification of art, i.e. make the art too simplistic, in their attempts to get closer to the audience and attract the audience to works of art. However, works of art should remain works of art that means that they should not become simplistic because of the level of audience. Instead, they should teach the audience and help the audience to elevate their aesthetic tastes to the higher level.
Thus, Swintak is reasonable in her views on art getting closer to the audience, but she should be aware of the fact that attempts of approaching the public may lead to simplification of works of art. In such a way, artists should help the audience to understand their art and makes their art interesting but still remain artists, who create works of art but not works that just entertain the audience.
Do you like this essay?
Our writers can write a paper like this for you!
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...